Ending the Conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Community banks represent approximately 20 percent of the mortgage market, and secondary market sales are a significant line of business for many community banks. While many community banks choose to hold most of their mortgage loans in portfolio, robust secondary market access remains critical for them to support mortgage lending demand.
Take Action Today
Help advocate for community banking by writing a letter to congress.
Join the ICBA Community
Explore the ICBA Community to see discussions on this and other issues.
Position & Background
As FHFA/Treasury begin the process of ending the conservatorships, ICBA urges them to consider the implications for community bank mortgage lenders and their customers and to carry out any transition in an orderly and transparent manner to avoid any disruption of the mortgage market.
ICBA does not support merging the GSEs into one entity. We believe this action would be disruptive, would not foster competition in the secondary market, and would stifle innovation.
The GSEs should continue to offer mortgage products such as cash-out refinances, investment properties, and second home loans that enable the cross-subsidization of lending within all markets and communities, benefiting all borrowers.
FHFA must transition into a strong independent regulator by providing robust oversight and supervision, capital requirements, and prudential standards that ensure safety and soundness of the GSEs and their ability to fulfill their mission as a liquidity provider for the housing market. Future regulation must allow the GSEs to innovate, compete within the framework of their charters, and not be subject to political interference.
FHFA should allow the GSEs to utilize their retained portfolios within limits established and supervised by FHFA to assist in securitization of new products and management of performance of the Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities (UMBS).
The GSEs and FHFA must ensure full and equal access for all lenders, regardless of size, including a prohibition on volume discounts with respect to guarantee fees, buy-up and buy-down fees, cash pricing, loan level price adjustments, and risk-sharing pricing.
The GSEs must maintain the cash window which allows a lender to sell one loan at a time and retain the servicing on that loan.
The GSEs must serve all markets, including underserved, rural, and urban areas, equally and in all economic conditions.
The GSEs must continue the credit risk transfer program to reduce their overall risk while also being mindful of the economic benefits and including prohibitions on market structures/actions that create an unlevel playing field for loan origination.
The GSEs should pay a reasonable ongoing fee for maintenance of the existing Treasury line of credit or any federal backstop. However, we do not support any explicit sovereign – Ginnie Mae-like guaranty on GSE debt or mortgage-backed securities.
The rights of existing GSE shareholders must be restored.
ICBA supports moving forward with administrative recapitalization plans per the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework (ERCF) to permit the GSEs to exit conservatorship into a utility-type system, including regulated rates of return and guardrails, that allows investors a fair return while furthering the GSEs’ public mission.
Community banks represent approximately 20 percent of the mortgage market, and secondary market sales are a significant line of business for many community banks. While many community banks choose to hold most of their mortgage loans in portfolio, robust secondary market access remains critical for them to support mortgage lending demand.
The current GSE secondary mortgage market structure has worked well for community banks by providing equitable access, not competing at the retail level, and permitting community banks to retain mortgage servicing rights on the loans they sell. However, the 17-year conservatorship of the GSEs has effectively nationalized the GSEs with the FHFA Director effectively running both companies. This has subjected the GSEs to undo political influence and may lead to initiatives that divert resources away from their primary mission to satisfy a political goal.
Letters & Testimonies
Letter to Senate on Changes to Section 705 of the ROAD to Housing Act
ICBA Expert Contacts